Preparing Everyday living plus Craft around Satellite TV and Movies.

You know how they say art reflects life, and life reflects art? I’ve been noticing that more and more lately. In reality, in a number of ways I have now been noticing mirror effects with all sorts of images bouncing off one another. It’s like Russian dolls stacked inside each other, except they never get any smaller. If you want to see the flicks and TV demonstrates watch in a fresh light, try thinking about the relationships of films alive, and of yourself as a viewer to the finished, polished product.

Of course, people are usually making movies based real-life stories. Sports events make particularly good material. The characters derive from real those who actually had these experiences. Does that mean it’s all fact? I get the feeling that there is more going on than just people telling stories about “what really happened.” In the 90s two movies came out, almost in the exact same year, in regards to the famous long-distance runner, Steve Prefontaine, one was called Without Limits and one other was called Prefontaine. Each movie has the exact same basic plot, and obviously the important points have to complement up – the races he won, the occasions he made, his tragically premature death – and yet they portray wildly different worlds. Which biopic relating to this sports legend, then, is more true?

Each person involved in interpreting “actual life” – whether writer, director, actor, or viewer – naturally inserts a few of his own art right into a story. In Without Limits, Donald Sutherland was cast in the role of Prefontaine and was wanting to artfully portray actual life, and yet Sutherland’s own life-experiences and skill as an actor were bound to influence the art as well. Along with that, the viewer adds another layer, sitting in a movie or before an HD TV, watching from the real-world as a piece of art – a movie – unfolds a tale about real life. As though it wasn’t already getting tangled enough, huge screens and high definition viewing allow an audience to actually feel as if they are watching a scene from natural life.

Given all this, I believe the lines between life and art really are a lot fuzzier than we like to think what is mike myers net worth. There’s even a skill in how real things are shown on TV – one single football game is covered by many different cameras constantly capturing different angles and concentrating on different players, with various quantities of zoom. The folks who edit all of that footage have to create rapid decisions about what to exhibit and what not to show.

As a viewer, you’re also starting to possess more choices about your personal “edits.” When you yourself have the NFL Sunday Ticket, you will know as possible choose to check out certain players. By selecting what highlights to view, you’re taking a dynamic role in “editing” actual life since it happens. I’m not wanting to draw any weighty conclusions, but I believe it adds a fresh amount of enjoyment to flipping in your television when you finally note that art is life and life is art.


Leave a Reply